Rudolf Fürst
Bürgstadt am Main • Germany
Image: Deutsches WeininstitutRudolf Fürst
Hohenlindenweg 46
63927 Bürgstadt am Main
Germany
Phone: +49 9371 8642
Fax: +49 9371 69230
Internet: www.weingut-rudolf-fuerst.de
E‑mail: info@weingut-rudolf-fuerst.de
The wines at a glance
2016 “Parzival” Qualitätswein trocken
VDP.GUTSWEIN®
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 20 18 • 13 % vol alcohol
2010 Klingenberg Schlossberg Spätburgunder Qualitätswein trocken
Großes Gewächs Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter e. V.
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 13 12 • 13.5 % vol alcohol
2009 Bürgstadt Centgrafenberg Riesling Qualitätswein
Großes Gewächs Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter e. V.
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 16 10 • 13.5 % vol alcohol
2009 Bürgstadt Centgrafenberg Spätburgunder Qualitätswein trocken
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 12 11 • 13 % vol alcohol
2009 Bürgstadt Centgrafenberg Spätburgunder Qualitätswein trocken
Großes Gewächs Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter e. V.
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 13 11 • 13.5 % vol alcohol
2009 Klingenberg Schlossberg Spätburgunder R Qualitätswein trocken
Großes Gewächs Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter e. V.
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 11 11 • 13 % vol alcohol
2006 Bürgstadt Centgrafenberg Spätburgunder R Qualitätswein trocken
Großes Gewächs Verband Deutscher Prädikatsweingüter e. V.
Germany
Franken • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 1095 16 08 • 13.5 % vol alcohol
Symbols
| 🯅 | The rating of the wine is based on a single taster. The taster is named in the context of the rating. The tasting was either open or blind. In case of a blind tasting, it is explicitly labelled as such. |
| 🯅🯅 | The rating of the wine is based on two tasters. The tasters are named in the context of the rating. The tasting was carried out according to the four-eyes principle, in which both tasters agree on a joint rating. |
| 🯅🯅🯅 | The rating is based on a tasting by our jury and indicates the Mean value calculated by us from the individual ratings of the tasters. Our mean value is based on the median. |
| ⚖ | The wine was evaluated in a blind tasting. We have strict rules for blind tastings. The tasters do not receive any information that would allow them to identify the wines. The tasters are only given access to further information that goes beyond the subject matter if it is absolutely necessary for understanding the wines. |
| 🕓 | We only had limited time to taste the wine - typically during an open tasting event, such as a wine fair. It was therefore not possible to observe the development of the wine in the glass over a longer period of time. The informative value of our rating may therefore be limited under certain circumstances. |
| ⛬ | The wine was tasted as a barrel sample or before an official test number (Amtliche Prüfungsnummer or Staatliche Prüfnummer) was issued. We only accept samples of unfilled wines in exceptional cases, and then only if we can assume sufficient stability in the bottle for a period of at least three months. |
| ▲ | During our tasting, the wine showed conspicuous sensory characteristics. This does not necessarily have to be a wine fault. We categorise the quality and quantity of the abnormality and include it in the rating. Wine faults such as cork taint or an atypical ageing generally lead to a complete rejection. |
| Tastings that refer to the same bottle of a wine are visually summarised by a dotted line. |