Stylistic device reduction
Playing with the fire
29 March 2024
Werner Elflein
Image: Pixabay… reduction?
Reduction occurs during fermentation as a result of a stress situation for the yeasts, primarily due to a lack of oxygen or nitrogen. It manifests itself in the wine as a sulfurous odour reminiscent of burnt matches, flint or flintstone. Reduction must be differentiated from the related mercaptan sulfurous off-flavour, which can produce unpleasant odours of rotten eggs, among other things, and is a serious wine defect. Because some reduction notes are perceived as quite pleasant, many winemakers try to bring them out in the wine.
Opinions differ when it comes to reduction notes. Depending on their type and character, they can be rejected, accepted or even evoke enthusiasm in wine drinkers. They often seem deliberate, not always skilful. In particular, we take a critical view of the trend towards reductive, aromatically one-dimensional Chardonnays with an artificial flinty flavour. A reductive note, if present, should favourably complement the aroma of a wine, but not replace it.
The 2018 Pinot Noir “Muschelkalk” from the J. Neus winery in Ingelheim is a successful example of how a striking reduction can give a wine new facets. Despite 12.5 % alcohol, it is rather light-bodied, glides elegantly over the tongue, impresses with cool flavours of cassis, has very restrained tannins and can score with a good length. However, its pronounced reductive note, which does not significantly diminish with years of ageing in the bottle, does not meet with universal approval.
Even its producers took stock of themselves and decided to make changes. While the 2018 still contained only the Neus clone, which was responsible for the (overly?) pronounced cassis flavour, for some vintages now a blend has been made with the yield from a young vineyard planted with a sélection massale. The makers also returned to the natural cork because they assumed a connection between the screw cap and the reduction note.
… the Neus clone?
The Neus clone goes back to the founder of the J. Neus winery, Josef Neus from Niederfell on the Lower Moselle, who came to Ingelheim in 1881. He bred a Pinot Noir clone that was remarkably resistant to phylloxera and various fungal diseases at the time and can still be found in the vineyards around Ingelheim today. Its flavour is strikingly reminiscent of cassis.
We tasted two bottlings of the 2018 Pinot Noir “Muschelkalk”, which can be distinguished by the official test number on the bottle label. The earlier one bears the serial number 4, the later one 10, and the differences were easy to identify in the triangle test. Although, as expected, the two bottlings are essentially the same, but they differ in detail. The later bottling clearly benefited from the longer maturation in the cask. It has a somewhat denser fruit flavour, with some cherry alongside the dominant cassis notes. And: the reduction is less pronounced. This confirms our suspicion that the wine would have benefited from longer maturation in the barrel. The screw cap is undoubtedly not partly responsible for the reduction notes.
With the successor vintages 2020 and 2021, the “Muschelkalk” has grown up. Reduction notes are barely perceptible, the wine is now much more complex and balanced, and the tannin quality is higher. In this respect, the winery has made the right decisions with regard to processing in the cellar. However, we consider the switch back to the anachronistic natural cork to be superfluous and misguided.
… a sélection massale?
In contrast to clonal breeding, the sélection massale favours biodiversity. Vines are selected and propagated according to site-specific characteristics. Genetic variance is expressly desired here and leads to more individualised wines. Sélection massale, which was superseded by clonal selection from the 1960s onwards, is becoming increasingly important again today.
The wines at a glance
J. Neus
Bahnhofstraße 96
55218 Ingelheim am Rhein
Germany
Phone: +49 6132 73003
Fax: +49 6132 2690
Internet: www.weingut-neus.de
E‑mail: info@weingut-neus.de
2018 Spätburgunder Muschelkalk Qualitätswein trocken
VDP.GUTSWEIN®
Germany
Rheinhessen • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 4366208 10 20 • 12.5 % vol alcohol
2018 Spätburgunder Muschelkalk Qualitätswein trocken
VDP.GUTSWEIN®
Germany
Rheinhessen • Geschützte Ursprungsbezeichnung (g. U.)
Amtliche Prüfungsnummer 4366208 4 20 • 12.5 % vol alcohol
Symbols
| 🯅 | The rating of the wine is based on a single taster. The taster is named in the context of the rating. The tasting was either open or blind. In case of a blind tasting, it is explicitly labelled as such. |
| 🯅🯅 | The rating of the wine is based on two tasters. The tasters are named in the context of the rating. The tasting was carried out according to the four-eyes principle, in which both tasters agree on a joint rating. |
| 🯅🯅🯅 | The rating is based on a tasting by our jury and indicates the Mean value calculated by us from the individual ratings of the tasters. Our mean value is based on the median. |
| ⚖ | The wine was evaluated in a blind tasting. We have strict rules for blind tastings. The tasters do not receive any information that would allow them to identify the wines. The tasters are only given access to further information that goes beyond the subject matter if it is absolutely necessary for understanding the wines. |
| 🕓 | We only had limited time to taste the wine - typically during an open tasting event, such as a wine fair. It was therefore not possible to observe the development of the wine in the glass over a longer period of time. The informative value of our rating may therefore be limited under certain circumstances. |
| ⛬ | The wine was tasted as a barrel sample or before an official test number (Amtliche Prüfungsnummer or Staatliche Prüfnummer) was issued. We only accept samples of unfilled wines in exceptional cases, and then only if we can assume sufficient stability in the bottle for a period of at least three months. |
| ▲ | During our tasting, the wine showed conspicuous sensory characteristics. This does not necessarily have to be a wine fault. We categorise the quality and quantity of the abnormality and include it in the rating. Wine faults such as cork taint or an atypical ageing generally lead to a complete rejection. |
| Tastings that refer to the same bottle of a wine are visually summarised by a dotted line. |